Skip to content
Film & TV

Perfume and the Psychology of Possessing Beauty

In Perfume, Grenouille kills not for pleasure but to possess a beauty he can never have — a need to own what we love that says something uncomfortable.

Perfume and the Psychology of Possessing Beauty

From the very first moment of his life, Grenouille isn’t an ordinary human being — not because he has “talent,” but because he’s literally a void walking on two legs; no one senses him, no one remembers him, not even his mother cared about him; she left him to die in the garbage and walked away. From here the dangerous idea starts to emerge: he’s not a villain who enjoys causing harm, he’s a person “empty inside”; his fundamental lack isn’t love or money, it’s “existence.”

Jump to section

Identity as Scent

In the film, identity isn’t built on appearance or name — in Grenouille’s world, identity equals scent. He sees people as walking smells, not faces or names. When he discovers he has no scent, he discovers he has no “self.” No essence. No presence. As if the universe forgot to put its final signature on him.

Possession Instead of Love

From the moment he learned he was scentless, Grenouille set off on a search for identity — not in the way we know it, not through a relationship, success, or an idea, but through “possession.” He doesn’t kill women because he wants to, he kills “what’s in them” — the beauty embodied in the scent of their skin, their hair, the faint sweat no one else notices. His real victim isn’t the body, his victim is “their extracted beauty.” He sees each of them not as a complete human being, but as a “note” in a great symphony he intends to gather and blend, to create the perfect perfume that will give him the feeling of existing, being loved, even worshipped. The idea here is of a man who sees himself as zero, so he tries to become “more than one” all at once, to become everything, to become a superhuman being who controls people’s feelings with a single scent.

Killer Aesthetics

If we look at Jean-Baptiste from another angle, we find him an embodiment of the idea of “killer aesthetics” (like the Hannibal story I talked about before). When you’re obsessed with the idea of “absolute beauty,” you’ll usually discover that this beauty has no place in reality as it is, so a part inside you says: “if you want that beauty for yourself alone, you have to destroy its source.” Every girl he kills isn’t a goal in herself, she’s an “ingredient” in the final perfume blend, which he sees as lifting him up from being nothing, into a superhuman being — one whose existence isn’t just heard or seen, but “smelled” to the point of worship. Absolute beauty here isn’t a painting, it’s something that leaks away, that fades with time, with sweat, heat, and death. That’s why he traps the moment in a bottle — but to trap it… he has to kill the original. This philosophy says there’s a type of person who, when they fall for something, isn’t content just to admire it — they want to possess it completely, and total possession means destroying the very freedom of the thing itself.

The clearest proof of this comes at the very end of the story, in the town square where Grenouille is due to be executed. He uncorks the perfume he built from thirteen murdered women, and the crowd, judges and priests and the father of one of his victims among them, collapses into a mass embrace, sobbing and worshipping a man they gathered to kill. It’s the one moment his plan actually works: total possession of everyone’s attention and desire, achieved through scent alone. And it changes nothing in him. He doesn’t feel triumphant. He walks away in the same numb silence he arrived in, because the crowd wasn’t loving him, it was loving the bottle. The self he’d been trying to manufacture was never in it to begin with.

That emptiness gets its final confirmation in how the story actually ends, not with Grenouille reigning over a conquered city but walking back to the Paris market where he was born, pouring the whole bottle over his own body, and letting a crowd of beggars devour him out of sheer overwhelming love for what they smell. It’s strange, if you sit with it, that a story built around a murderer’s ambition ends this way. A revenge fantasy or a study in the pleasures of domination would crown him. Instead the novel argues that possession was never going to fix what was wrong, because the hole in him wasn’t a shortage of beauty in the world. It was a shortage of himself. No amount of stolen essence could fill a container that never existed in the first place.

That’s what separates Grenouille from the serial killers popular culture usually gives us. Most fictional killers, and most real forensic profiling categories, are organized around power, control, or a twisted moral logic, where the kill is a means to feeling superior or feeling justified. Grenouille wants none of that. He barely registers his victims as people to dominate, and fear interests him not at all. He’s chasing something most of us take for granted without ever naming it: the plain, unremarkable sense of having a self other people can register. Take that away from someone entirely, from birth, and Perfume asks an ugly question most stories won’t touch, not whether such a person could become a monster, but whether the rest of us are only decent because we’ve never had to find out.